Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Azerbaijan - Global Laundromat

it is getting hot...

  • Please log in to reply
79 replies to this topic

#61 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 February 2020 - 10:14 AM

Armenpress.am
 

Azerbaijani ex-banker’s wife loses London appeal over unexplained wealth orders

 
 
Share
 
1003901.jpg 14:00, 6 February, 2020

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 6, ARMENPRESS. The London Court of Appeal has rejected an Azerbaijani banker’s wife Zamira Hajiyeva's attempt to stop the UK's first ever Unexplained Wealth Order from being implemented against her.

Hajiyeva spent £16m of unexplained wealth in Harrods in a decade.

Hajiyeva must reveal how she became wealthy enough to buy a mansion near Harrods and a golf course in Berkshire.

She faces losing the properties if she can't provide proof of income, the BBC reported.

Hajiyeva's husband, Jahangir Hajiyev, was the chairman of the state-controlled International Bank of Azerbaijan from 2001 until his resignation in 2015, and was later jailed for 15 years for fraud and embezzlement.

Dismissing the appeal on Wednesday, Lord Justice Burnett, the Lord Chief Justice, also refused to allow Hajiyeva to take the case to the Supreme Court - and ordered her to pay the National Crime Agency's (NCA) legal costs.

In the judgment, Lord Justice Burnett and two other senior judges said that Hajiyeva had been lawfully targeted by the first ever Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO) two years ago.

"The relevant requirement for making a UWO [is that] the court must be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the known sources of the lawfully obtained income available [to the targeted individual] would have been insufficient to enable him or her to obtain the property," said the judges as quoted by the BBC.

The Azerbaijani woman must now present the sources of her wealth, including how she was able to buy her £15m home and the Mill Ride Golf Course in Berkshire.

Sarah Pritchard, of the NCA's National Economic Crime Centre, said it was a "significant result".

"As a new piece of legislation we anticipated that there would be legal challenge," she said. "We are pleased that the court has upheld the case today. It will set a helpful precedent for future UWO cases."

 

 

https://armenpress.a...QUuATU1ObHMUsmc



#62 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 01 November 2020 - 07:58 AM

The Times of Israel
Oct 27 2020
 
 
Report: Israeli arms manufacturers paid millions to Azeris through Russian bank Following a FinCEN Files report that Israel Aerospace Industries paid suspicious sums to a reported slush fund for Azeri elites, new report reveals Russian involvement
By SIMONA WEINGLASS 27 October 2020, 6:18 am

Last month, The Times of Israel reported that Israel’s largest aerospace manufacturer, Israel Aerospace Industries, transferred at least $155 million in 2012-2014 to two companies that were reportedly used as a secret slush fund for Azerbaijan’s kleptocratic elite.

new report published earlier this month on Russian investigative reporting website Important Stories reveals that a second Israeli state-owned arms manufacturer, Israel Military Industries Ltd (IMI Systems Ltd), transferred close to $5 million in 2017 to one of these two same “slush fund” companies.

In addition, Important Stories has reported, the bank accounts for these two offshore companies were serviced by the Russian bank International Financial Club, which is part owned by the wife of Sergei Chemezov, the CEO of Russia’s state-owned arms manufacturer and exporter, Rostec. In other words, a bank that is partly owned by the wife of a US-sanctioned Putin ally performed a key role in suspicious payments from two state-owned Israeli arms manufacturers to offshore companies reportedly controlled by members of the Azeri elite.

The Important Stories report is based on a suspicious activity report (or SAR) filed by The Bank of New York with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the United States Department of the Treasury (FinCEN) in December 2017. The SAR became public as part of a leak of FinCEN documents that the BuzzFeed news site shared with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) and with 108 other media outlets and some 400 journalists around the world. Important Stories is the ICIJ’s partner in Russia.

The submission of a suspicious activity report to FinCEN does not mean that the individual or company mentioned in the document has done anything illegal. The transactions described in such reports can be part of entirely legitimate business activities that happened to conform to patterns that aroused the suspicion of the financial institution reporting them.

According to the Important Stories report, in December 2017, The Bank of New York filed an SAR concerning a $5 million payment from IMI Systems Ltd. to the British Virgin Islands company Jetfield Network.

Jetfield Network was founded in New Zealand in 2009 and was later incorporated in the Marshall Islands in February 2012. It originally described itself as engaged in commerce, including the buying and selling of construction equipment, but later branched out into “consulting services.”

The company’s beneficiary is Javid Huseynov, an Azeri man born in 1961. Huseynov is also the beneficiary of Larkstone Ltd., a company incorporated in Estonia, according to reporting by journalist Uri Blau and Hashomrim-the Center for Media and Democracy, which is ICIJ’s partner in Israel. Huseynov does not have much of a public profile and the Important Stories report suggested that he may be a nominee owner.

As reported by Blau and Hashomrim, Jetfield and Larkstone together received over $150 million in payments from Israel Aerospace Industries in 2012-2014, shortly after the company signed a $1.6 billion arms deal with Azerbaijan.

Important Stories further revealed that from June 2016 to May 2017 Israel Aerospace Industries paid $ 2.8 million to a British Virgin Islands firm called. Bakinshaat Group Ltd., whose website describes it as a construction company involved in government projects in Azerbaijan. According to Important Stories, all three companies, Jetfield, Larkstone and Bakinshaat Group, had bank accounts with International Financial Club.

Jetfield and Larkstone were revealed in a 2017 expose by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) to be central nodes in what became known as The Azerbaijani Laundromat.

The OCCRP revealed that Jetfield and Larkstone paid money into companies that were used as a slush fund by cronies of the regime of Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev to purchase luxury goods as well as to buy good PR for the regime.

For instance, more than 2 million euros that left Azerbaijan, with a portion going through Jetfield, reportedly ended up in 2012 in the bank account of Italian politician Luca Volontè, Rome’s representative to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE). Italian police suspect that in exchange for the payment, Volontè tried to soften the European Council criticisms of human rights violations in Azerbaijan. The investigation, launched in 2015, is ongoing.

According to Important Stories, it is odd that while Jetfield Network is registered in the British Virgin Islands, it was serviced by the Russian bank International Financial Club.

International Financial Club’s main shareholder is a businessman by the name of Mikhail Prokhorov (he owns 47.8%). Interestingly 6.5% of the company’s shares are owned by Ekaterina Ignatova, the wife of the head of Rostec, Sergei Chemezov.

Chemezov is CEO of Rostec, the state-owned Russian  conglomerate that controls weapons manufacturing in Russia. Chemezov is under US Treasury Department sanctions for being a Russian government official and is barred from entering the United States. The Treasury Department has described Chemezov as “a trusted ally of President Putin, whom he has known since the 1980’s when they lived in the same apartment complex in East Germany.”

According to Important Stories, in 2016 compliance officers at The Bank of New York got in touch with International Financial Club to ask why a company from the British Virgin Islands was being serviced by a Russian bank and why it had received funds from an Israeli arms supplier to Azerbaijan.

International Financial Club replied that Jetfield Network had had an account with the bank since August 2015 and that its main activity was providing consulting and marketing services.

In 2009, Israel became a signatory to the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, which criminalizes bribery of foreign government officials.

According to Important Stories, while it makes no sense on its face that two state-owned Israeli arms manufacturers would need a Russian bank to transfer payments to offshore companies associated with the Azeri elite, this pattern of payments suggests that “the owners of the International Financial Club and the people behind the offshore intermediaries may have a close relationship… because in such ‘delicate transactions,’ when it comes to arms shipments and payments to offshore intermediaries, it is important to have a trusting relationship with bankers so that transactions are not immediately blocked.”

Russia plays both sides in the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan. It has a military alliance with Armenia as well as a military base in the country, but it also sells weapons to Azerbaijan.

The fact that an individual close to the Russian regime is linked to payments from Israeli weapons companies to Azeris raises questions of what kind of leverage or access Russia might have to Israeli state-owned arms manufacture.

Israel Aerospace Industries is a longtime collaborator with the US defense contractor Boeing in developing the advanced Arrow missile defense system.

Israeli journalist Yossi Melman recently reported in Foreign Policy that Israeli counterintelligence officials believe both China and Russia are spying on Israel, in part in order to steal US military secrets.

It has been widely reported that Israel is the top supplier of arms to Azerbaijan, including of lethal “kamikaze” drones that some analysts believe have helped Azerbaijan gain an edge over Armenia in the current hostilities in Nagorno-Karabakh.

The United States provides military equipment to Azerbaijan as well.

In a 2020 report, Human Rights Watch describes Azerbaijan as a country with a poor human rights record: “Azerbaijan’s authorities continued to maintain rigid control, severely curtailing freedoms of association, _expression_, and assembly.“

Critics of Israeli weapons sales to Azerbaijan have argued that Israel is siding with the oppressive dictatorship of Azerbaijan as opposed to its democratizing neighbor. Others have said that Israel should support Armenia, or at least not actively arm its enemy, out of respect for Jews’ and Armenians’ shared historical experience of genocide. Last week, activist Elie Yossef, a longtime critic of Israeli arms sales to despotic regimes, petitioned Israel’s High Court of Justice to force Israel to halt all arms sales to Azerbaijan immediately.

“The moment that Azeri forces invade and conquer Nagorno-Karabakh, with aerial cover and massive bombing, there will have to be a miracle to prevent massive slaughter of Armenians there,” he wrote in the petition. (While there is no evidence of genocide in the current Nagorno-Karabakh hostilities, scholars have said there is a possible genocide risk.)

Defenders of Israel’s arms sales point out that Azerbaijan is strategically located next to Israel’s archenemy, Iran. It is reported that Azerbaijan has agreed to let Israel use its airfields in the event of a potential armed conflict with Iran.

https://www.timesofi...8bEKLozln1F3U84


#63 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 November 2020 - 08:58 AM

Offshore company purchases luxurious London apartment for son of Azerbaijani top official

Share
 

1033774.jpg 18:11, 3 November, 2020

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 3, ARMENPRESS. Juma Ahmadzada, son of head of Azerbaijan’s state water resources management company Ahmad Ahmadzada, lives in a luxury apartment in the heart of London, but the apartment has been purchased not by him, but an offshore firm called Vremax Properties Limited, the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) said in an investigative report.

Azerbaijan’s state water resources management company led by Ahmad Ahmadzada has signed two beneficial contracts with construction companies owned by Turkish multi-millionaire Mehmet Cengiz. Several months after signing a contract, another company controlled by Cengiz in London has paid a consultancy fee of $3.07 million to Vremax.

 

Several months after the payment, Vremax purchased a $2.3-million luxury apartment in the heart of London. The apartment was already occupied by a young businessman from Azerbaijan, Juma Ahmadzada. Vremax immediately gave him permission to keep living there. What’s more, two years after the initial purchase, the secretive offshore company bought two other apartments next door and allowed Ahmadzada to remodel them, creating a truly palatial residence for him.

OCCRP has seen no direct evidence that the apartment represented a bribe. The owners of Vremax are unknown, as is whether the firm did any real consulting work and whether it had any other sources of income. Finally, the specific role that may have been played by Mehmet Cengiz, Juma Ahmadzada, or his father, Ahmad, in these arrangements is unknown.

The heart of the mystery lies in the offshore secrecy that makes Vremax’s true nature nearly impossible to discover. That’s why the affair warrants further investigation, according to two corruption specialists who reviewed OCCRP’s findings.



#64 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 January 2021 - 08:58 AM

Panorama, Armenia

Jan 12 2021
 
 
Former Italian lawmaker involved in Azerbaijani “Caviar Diplomacy” sentenced to four year in prison
 
 
The former Chairman of the Parliamentary Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights of the Council of Europe, Luca Volonte, was sentenced to four years in jail on Monday for taking a bribe from two Azerbaijan politicians to get the Council of Europe to pull a critical report on political prisoners in Azerbaijan, He was found guilty of taking about two million euros from the Azeri politicians, who were given the same four-year sentence, ANSA news agency reported.
 
Luca Volonte has been involved in the international 'Caviar Diplomacy' scandal, according to the investigation of the international NGO European Stability Initiative. He was accused of receiving 2.3 million euros from Azerbaijan, which was spent on bribing a number of PACE deputies to fail the report on political prisoners in Azerbaijan.
 
To remind, in early 2013, the Council of Europe discussed a critical report concerning the treatment of political prisoners in Azerbaijan, presented by Christoph Straesser, a German Social Democrat member of the parliamentary assembly of the Council.
 
According to investigators, Volontè had been tasked by Azerbaijani officials to “direct votes within his parliamentary group” in favor of the country. He also sought the support of Spanish EPP member Pedro Agramunt to divide the socialist group and vote down the Straesser report. The report was eventually rejected by 125 to 79. The strong criticism on human rights in Azerbaijan, an oil-rich country classified as “not free” by the U.S-based democracy watchdog Freedom House, was then rejected.
 


#65 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 21 January 2021 - 08:31 AM

Public Radio of Armenia
Jan 20 2021
 
 
Polish politician offered $50,000 to refuse from publishing a brochure on Azerbaijan’s war crimes against Armenians
 
Polish politician offered $50,000 to refuse from publishing a brochure on Azerbaijan’s war crimes against Armenians – Public Radio of Armenia

Polish politician Tomasz Lech Buczek says he was offered $50,000 for canceling the publication of a brochure on Azerbaijani war crimes against Armenians. 

Buczek shared a screenshot of a message he received from an Azerbaijani user reading “The Azerbaijani government will give you $50,000, if you don’t publish the publication about Azerbaijani crimes. If interested, please post a photo of Baku on January 25th on Facebook.”

“President Aliyev probably heard about my publication?” My response to Baku is: ‘Release the Armenian prisoners of war’,” Buczek captioned the screenshot.  

 

Buczek earlier announced a fundraiser to publish the brochure that would be the world’s first printed publication on Azerbaijan’s war crimes against the Armenian population in Artsakh.

The publication specifically details the tortures and inhuman treatment of Armenian war prisoners held in Azerbaijan. 

Tomasz Lech Buczek, author of “The Cry of the Armenian Mother, Genocide in Sumgait, 1988” has also initiated the establishment of a civilian committee for recognizing the independence of Artsakh.

 

  • MosJan likes this

#66 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 March 2021 - 08:53 AM

Armenpress.am
 

Another German lawmaker quits amid lobbying allegations involving Azerbaijan

 
 
Share
 
1045877.jpg 13:43, 12 March, 2021

YEREVAN, MARCH 12, ARMENPRESS. German lawmaker Mark Hauptmann (CDU) has resigned amid lobbying allegations, Deutsche Welle reports.

Hauptmann's departure follows a report by news magazine Spiegel over Azerbaijani, Taiwanese and Vietnamese tourism ads run in the "Südthüringer Kurier," a CDU-near local newspaper he publishes. He had been accused of accepting money from foreign agencies.

 
 

He denies wrongdoing.

Mark Hauptmann is the third German parliamentarian among Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservatives to exit over lobbying claims.

On March 5, the Bundestag stripped MP Axel Fischer from immunity to pave way for an investigation into alleged bribery from Azeri authorities.

 

 

https://armenpress.a...WqxPWAmX509oUqs



#67 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 29 May 2021 - 07:49 AM

standard.co.uk
 
Evening Standard victory as couple accused of bringing £14m of ‘dirty’ cash into Britain can be named
 
A

London couple accused of bringing £14 million of “dirty money” from Azerbaijan into Britain should be named, a judge ruled today in a major step forward in the fight against secret justice.

District Judge Vanessa Baraitser said that continuing to conceal the couple’s identities would be a disproportionate interference with the principle of open justice as she lifted an anonymity order protecting their names.

The judge — who was making her ruling at Westminster magistrates court in response to an application by the Evening Standard backed by the National Crime Agency — added that there were also no grounds for holding any of a forthcoming forfeiture hearing involving the “laundromat” couple in secret.

 

Instead, full details of the allegations against them will be made public. In a concession to the couple, the judge granted a seven day “stay” on naming the couple — who own several multi-million pound London properties and face the seizure of around £6.5 million in their bank accounts — to allow them to seek a judicial review of her decision.

The pair’s lawyers have said they want a High Court injunction and permission for judicial review on the grounds that lifting anonymity will interfere with other proceedings. But if their bid fails the couple’s names will finally be made public next week.

The couple, who can only be referred to as X and Y, are accused by the National Crime Agency of using a complex web of “brass plate” companies in locations ranging from the Seychelles to Potters Bar to launder illicit money made by the “ruling elite” in Azerbaijan.

The NCA alleges that the money was moved via banks in Estonia and Latvia into accounts at Coutts, Barclays, Lloyds, Santander and Metro Bank and told a previous court hearing that allegedly fake invoices for £500 million worth of steel were one method used to mask the money transfers.

It has also disclosed that several of the companies involved in transferring money to the couple have been identified as involved in the Azerbaijan laundromat — a scheme under which billions of pounds made via corruption was moved by the Azeri elite to the West to buy property and fund their lifestyles overseas.

In her ruling today, Judge Baraitser says that there is a “public interest in informed public debate” about account forfeiture orders.

She adds: “Such debate is stimulated and enhanced by the identities of the parties being revealed… and, in accordance with the usual principle of open justice the public has a right to know who they are.

“In this case the press has a legitimate journalistic purpose in reporting these proceedings, namely to inform the public about the process of forfeiture and to contribute to public debate about the flow of “dirty” money into the United Kingdom and its laundering through our financial institutions.

“In all of the circumstances, I have concluded that an anonymity order preventing the disclosure of their names would now be a disproportionate interference with the principle of open justice and with article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights. I am satisfied that lifting anonymity is both proportionate and necessary.”

The judge points out that the Evening Standard had submitted that its  “purpose in reporting these proceedings is to contribute to public debate, in this case the use of the UK’s financial systems to launder large sums of money derived from unlawful sources in Azerbaijan.”

She said this had not been contested by the couple’s lawyers and nor had the newspaper’s argument that the case also “raises important questions about the safeguards that are in place against such activity, and about the visa policy operated by the Home Office which enables access to the UK’s systems.”

She added that a previous judge had found that this newspaper had a “proper journalistic purpose” in wanting to report the proceedings and identify the couple.

Judge Baraitser said the couple, who had originally sought a fully private forfeiture hearing which the press would have been unable to report, had also provided no evidence to support a subsequent application for proceedings to be conducted partially behind closed doors.

She said there was no reason to allow this, stating in her judgment that: “The burden of displacing the general rule as to publicity lies on the Respondents [X and Y].... and there is no evidence before me which would justify a derogation from the usual principle of open justice.

“As no substantive reasons have been advanced to depart from the usual principle I reject the application that the forfeiture hearing, or any part of it, should be heard in private.”

This newspaper has been fighting for nearly two years to name the couple as part of a court battle that is also intended to make it easier for the media to report future “dirty money” forfeiture cases.

The couple deny wrongdoing and are contesting the forfeiture of their accounts.

 

 

https://www.standard...ed-b937553.html

 


  • MosJan likes this

#68 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 June 2021 - 09:50 AM

Public Radio of Armenia
June 10 2021
 
 
Swedish Bombardier executive charged for Azerbaijan bribery 

 

A former manager at the Swedish branch of Bombardier Transportation, a major engineering company, has been indicted on Wednesday on charges of aggravated bribery in what is one of Sweden’s biggest ever corruption scandals, OCCRP reports.

Thomas Bimer, a former business area manager at Bombardier in Sweden, will now face trial for his role in the allegedly corrupt tender that Bombardier won in Azerbaijan in 2013.

Prosecutors argue the $350 million contract to install signaling systems for a section of Azeri railway involved Bombardier paying a $100 million bribe to at least one mid-ranking railway executive.

“[Bimer] was the head of the department in charge of this project. We believe that he was aware that Bombardier colluded with the customer in Azerbaijan,” Prosecutor Staffan Edlund, of the National Anti-Corruption Unit, told OCCRP.

The allegedly bribed Azeri railway executive also represented a local business, Trans-Signal-Rabita (TSR), which won the tender together with the Swedish company. TSR and Bombardier Sweden rigged the tender so that Bombardier Sweden would win it, according to the indictment now being filed in the Stockholm District Court.

Both Mr Bimer and Bombardier deny any wrongdoing, as does the Azeri railway executive, says the prosecutor, although Swedish investigators have not been able to question the latter.

Furthermore, it is likely that there were other employees at the railway authority in Azerbaijan who received a cut of the payments.

The prosecutor notes that Swedish Bombardier’s former CEO was previously also suspected of bribery, along with several others, yet the insufficiency of evidence means there is not enough to prove any guilt in his case.

Bombardier Sweden has since been sold to the French company Alstom, but it still risks being excluded from any future World Bank-financed projects. The financial institution has reportedly not made any final decisions.

 

https://en.armradio....baijan-bribery/



#69 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 01 July 2021 - 06:19 AM

Armenpress.com
 

Aliyev’s cousin brought £14 million from Azerbaijan to UK through money laundering, Evening Standard reveals

 
 
Share
 
1056974.jpg 15:29, 30 June, 2021

YEREVAN, JUNE 30, ARMENPRESS. A British court has revealed the identity of the couple who illegally brought £14 million to UK through the “Azerbaijan laundromat”, Armenpress reports citing Evening Standard.

Izzat Khanim Javadova, an oligarch’s daughter who performs as a DJ using the name Mikaela Jav, and Suleyman Javadov are accused by the National Crime Agency of using the proceeds of corruption to finance their life in the capital.

 
 

It is trying to seize their multi-million pound bank accounts and has told a court that the money is being laundered in this country after being transferred here via a complex web of transactions, including fake invoices for vast quantities of steel, to hide its illicit origin.

The pair own several London homes between them worth millions of pounds, including a flat in Whitehall with views over the Thames, a riverside home in Twickenham, and an upmarket apartment in Clerkenwell.

They are also understood to own a villa overlooking the sea in Ibiza and a luxury flat on the party island, as well as an extensive property portfolio in Azerbaijan.

They deny any wrongdoing and had managed to persuade the courts to keep their identities secret until now on the grounds that revealing their names would damage their reputation.

But in a victory for the Evening Standard, which has been fighting a court battle for nearly two years to have the veil of secrecy lifted, an anonymity order protecting them finally expired today to allow the couple to be named.

Ms Javadova is the cousin of Azerbaijan’s ruler Ilham Aliyev and the daughter of a former Azerbaijan MP Jalal Aliyev, the former ruler’s brother. She came to London at least ten years ago and was given a visa by the Home Office because of her wealth.

She set up a London company called Love the Underground Records and used it to stage dance parties in parties in London at venues including Kensington Roof Gardens and numerous events in Ibiza.

A forfeiture hearing at which the National Crime Agency is seeking to seize around £6.5 million in accounts at Coutts, Barclays, Lloyds, Metro Bank and Santander held by either Mr Javadov or Ms Javadova is due to be begin next week.

The couple have claimed in evidence to investigators that their wealth came from rental income from their property portfolio in Azerbaijan.

But the National Crime Agency has told Westminster Magistrates court that it believes the true source was corruption and that any genuine income did not match the large sums sent to London.

The court documents allege that the money sent to the Javadovs’ accounts came via 21 “brass plate” companies operating from locations ranging from the Seychelles and the Marshall Islands to Potters Bar and Ayr and banks in Estonia and Latvia.

They say that six of these companies have been named separately as part of the “Azerbaijan laundromat” scheme – under which vast sums have been chanelled out of the former Soviet state to support the lifestyle of the country’s ruling elite - and that they in turn had already received funds from other “laundromat” companies.

 

 

https://armenpress.a...fzdtN9UoyywHzHo



#70 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 February 2022 - 09:45 AM

VOA

UK Judge Orders Family of Azerbaijani MP to Forfeit $7.6 Million

Baku, Azerbaijan. A British judge this week ordered the family of an
Azerbaijani lawmaker to forfeit some $7.6 million to the National
Crime Agency on the grounds that the funds were illegally brought into
Britain.

The judgment against the family of Javanshir Feyziyev, a member of
Azerbaijan's parliament, relates to the so-called Azerbaijani
Laundromat, a complex money-laundering scheme that was initially
exposed by Danish newspaper Berlingske and the Organized Crime and
Corruption Reporting Project in 2017.

Records indicate that four United Kingdom-registered shell companies
processed some $2.9 billion in transactions, which Azerbaijan's ruling
elite were allegedly using to bribe European politicians, buy luxury
goods and enrich themselves.

Azerbaijan's government routinely ranks low on Transparency
International's Corruption Perceptions Index reflecting the country's
continuing struggle to make gains in democratic elections, judicial
independence and free press.

"The current kleptocratic system owes its existence to corruption and
bribery," Azerbaijani human rights defender and former prosecutor
Rufat Safarov told VOA.

Once imprisoned by Azerbaijan authorities on what international human
rights organizations deemed politically motivated charges, Safarov
considers graft to be almost standard for governance in his country.

"The state governing structures — institutions tasked with the fight
against corruption — not only fail to fulfill their functions, but in
government structures, inclination toward bribery is ordinary,"
Safarov said.

According to economist Gubad Ibadoglu, in Azerbaijan, the fight
against corruption is an imitation. In his view, the endemic
corruption has affected judiciary, police and even social security
organs of the state.

"Corruption is intertwined with political system and authoritarian
governance," Ibadoglu told VOA, adding that all branches of the
government are under the thumb of the executive branch.

Azerbaijani authorities, however, persistently reject such assessments
of the country's record on corruption.

Gunay Selimzade, press officer for the prosecutor general, states that
her government takes "intensive measures" to remedy corruption in the
spheres of legislation, criminal investigation and raising public
awareness.

"The fight against corruption in Azerbaijan via institutional and
criminal investigative measures has been highly assessed by experts of
the influential international organizations," she told VOA.

Kamran Aliyev, the country's chief prosecutor, recently touted some
statistics as evidence of the ongoing struggle against corruption.
According to him, police have closed criminal corruption
investigations involving nearly 500 individuals in 2021.

Independent observers view such numbers more as an attempt to cover up
the government's poor record of combating corruption. According to
Ibadoglu, reducing corruption will depend on the establishment of rule
of law and an independent judiciary that can investigate charges of
corruption.

To date, very few top officials have been charged or prosecuted on
charges stemming from financial scandals reported abroad, including
the notorious Azerbaijani Laundromat case.

This story originated in VOA's Azerbaijan Service.

https://urldefense.c...PU-v_WzZVM60Dw$
 



#71 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 21 February 2022 - 09:11 AM

OCCRP

Sons of Azerbaijani Strongman Vasif Talibov Received Millions From
Money Laundering Systems

Feb. 20, 2022

[Having opened bank accounts with Credit Suisse, Barclays, and other
foreign banks, Rza and Seymur Talibov received over $20 million in
suspicious wire transfers, even as the people of the Azerbaijani
exclave of Nakhchivan suffered under their father’s dictatorial rule.]

Key Findings

The Talibov brothers’ bank accounts received dozens of wire
transfers from shell companies that were part of the Azerbaijani and
Troika Laundromats, two massive money laundering systems previously
uncovered by OCCRP.

A financial crime expert who reviewed the transactions found
multiple red flags for money laundering that he said banks should have
noticed.

In subsequent years, the brothers bought up properties in Dubai
and Georgia worth an estimated $63 million.

In late 2007, two young Azerbaijani brothers received an infusion of
cash just in time for the holidays.

But this wasn’t pocket money. Nineteen-year-old Seymur had $40,000
transferred to his personal bank account on December 27. On the same
day, his 25-year-old brother Rza got $95,000 of his own.

As an explanation, both transactions listed simply the word “textile.”
This was strange, since these were not corporate accounts — and the
brothers had no known connection to any textile business.

It didn’t end there. Within months, Seymur and Rza both started to
receive more cash, in much larger bank transfers — up to $500,000 at a
time, often in implausibly round figures. The listed reasons for the
transfers expanded to include “metal,” “metal parts,” and “electrical
equipment.” By the end of 2012, they had received over $20 million in
total.

Clearly, these weren’t ordinary transactions. But then, these were not
ordinary brothers.

Seymur and Rza are the sons of one of Azerbaijan’s top officials:
Their father, Vasif Talibov, is the ruler of Nakhchivan, an autonomous
exclave located between Iran, Turkey, and Armenia.

Talibov has led Nakhchivan with an iron fist for more than 26 years.
Under his rule, detainees have been subject to beatings and vicious
torture. Dissidents have been forced into psychiatric hospitals. He
has also used his power to silence independent media: Journalists and
activists who criticized his rule have faced pressure, arrest, and
exile.

Now, through an analysis of several leaks of banking data and property
records, OCCRP can show that the Talibov family enriched itself from
questionable sources even as Nakhchivan’s people suffered.

Leaked banking records show that the millions Talibov’s sons received
came from shell companies associated with the Azerbaijani and Troika
Laundromats, massive money laundering schemes discovered by OCCRP.
Previous investigations showed that Azerbaijani elites, including a
cousin of President Ilham Aliyev, benefitted from one of these
systems. Now the powerful Talibov family — which is also connected to
the president by marriage — can be added to the list.

The data obtained by reporters doesn’t show what the Talibovs did with
the money they received. But soon after the transactions began, they
started spending.

In 2008, the elder Talibov brother, Rza, his mother, a cousin, and
several businessmen founded a bank together.

Four years later, just as the Laundromat transactions reached their
peak, Rza bought two adjacent buildings in the Georgian resort town of
Batumi that he converted into a five-star hotel. Rza, Seymur, and
their sister Baharkhanim — who also received nearly a million dollars
from Laundromat companies — have also acquired about a dozen
properties in Dubai, including a luxurious villa, a 12-floor apartment
hotel, and multiple individual apartments. In total, their properties
are worth an estimated $63 million.

Azerbaijan's Totalitarian Fortress

In Nakhchivan, Vasif Talibov’s word is law. He has ruled over the
isolated territory through fear and violence for years — and hardly
any news gets out.

This is despite Vasif Talibov’s official salary of less than $26,000
per year and his sons’ own low-paying government jobs. (Rza is a
migration service official and Seymur is a member of the Nakhchivan
parliament.)

In fact, their family’s political status should have subjected their
financial transactions to greater scrutiny. The bank accounts where
they received their millions were held with major financial
institutions in multiple countries, including Emirates NBD, Barclays,
and Credit Suisse. It is unknown whether any of the transactions were
flagged as suspicious.

Graham Barrow, an independent financial crime specialist who reviewed
the transactions, said the brothers’ accounts should have been flagged
given their questionable origins and the Talibovs’ status as
politically exposed persons.

“[The banks] should do what’s known as adverse media screening,” he
said. “They should see whether their client has been involved in any
potential criminal activity or suspicious activity and they should
monitor them. It’s called enhanced monitoring.”

“It’s ridiculous. Those round figures, it’s just stupid. I mean,
nobody does business that way.”

In response to inquiries from OCCRP and Süddeutsche Zeitung, Credit
Suisse said it could not comment on individual client relationships
and rejected “allegations and inferences about [its] purported
business practices.” (Click here to read the bank’s full response to
the Suisse Secrets project).

Two other banks where the Talibovs held accounts that received
questionable funds, Vontobel and Emirates NBD, said that they could
not comment on client relationships but that they complied with the
law.

Barclays and members of the Talibov family did not respond to requests
for comment.

“A World Upside-Down”

Vasif Talibov has ruled over Nakhchivan for so long that it’s hard to
imagine the territory without him. But his beginnings were modest: In
the late Soviet years he was the head of a department at a local
garment factory.

His ticket to power turned out to be his marriage to Sevil Sultanova,
whose mother’s uncle was a senior Soviet official named Heydar Aliyev.

As the country neared collapse in 1990, Aliyev returned from Moscow to
his home region of Nakhchivan. Having nowhere else to stay, he
temporarily lived with Talibov in his two-bedroom apartment.

He returned the favor the following year. After being elected chairman
of Nakhchivan’s parliament, Aliyev made Talibov, then in his early
30s, his head assistant.

“When I chose Vasif Talibov for this position, I knew many of his
characteristics,” Aliyev said later. “He was very young. Inwardly, I
thought for a while that it would be difficult because of his youth.
But he proved that a person who is loyal to his homeland, nation and
people, regardless of age, can do great things.”

In 1993, Aliyev became president of newly independent Azerbaijan. And
with his backing, Talibov’s star continued to rise. In 1995, not long
after being elected to both the Azerbaijani and the local Nakhchivani
parliaments, he became chairman of the latter.

This position, to which he has regularly been “reelected” every five
years, makes him the republic’s absolute ruler, able to appoint
ministers, push laws through a pliant parliament, control the justice
system, and run the security agencies.

He has now ruled for nearly three decades, outlasting his original
patron, Heydar Aliyev, and now enjoying a similarly close relationship
with his son, Ilham, who succeeded him to the presidency.

The local media in Nakhchivan heaps praise on Talibov’s rule. “Today
is HIS day,” wrote the local news agency Nuhcixan on his 60th
birthday, describing him as “the great patriot, resolute, courageous,
as well as humanist,” but also “extremely humble.”

Internationally, the headlines are somewhat different, often focusing
on the draconian rules Talibov has imposed — like his instruction for
local citizens to read Hemingway, or his bans on hanging laundry on
balconies or civil servants wearing patterned tights. Foreign outlets
have also reported on his crackdowns on journalists and dissidents.

This has earned Nakhchivan a variety of nicknames: Opposition
activists call it the “North Korea of Azerbaijan,” while the Norwegian
Helsinki Committee described it as “Azerbaijan’s Dark Island.”

On visiting the territory, a U.S. diplomat wrote to his superiors in
Washington that the region was Talibov’s “fiefdom.”

“Nakhchivan is a world upside down,” the diplomat wrote.

The Talibovs’ Tight Grip

The Talibovs’ stranglehold on Nakhchivan is not just political. It is
widely assumed in Nakhchivan that the family dominates the local
economy, and experts have described them restricting imports, driving
competitors out of business, and even putting residents to work
harvesting their produce.

According to an exiled Nakhchivani, many products in the territory are
sold under the brand Gamigaya, a group of companies widely assumed to
belong to the family. The Gamigaya holding has also built or renovated
dozens of public facilities across Nakhchivan, including ministry
buildings, hospitals, universities, and a mosque.

Little documented proof of the Talibovs’ connection to this group of
companies — or to Cahan Holding, another omnipresent local
conglomerate — has ever emerged. In 2014, Rza Talibov described
himself on Facebook as Gamigaya’s chairman. But no company ownership
records are available to show who actually owns either conglomerate.

Instead, the Gamigaya and Cahan holdings are run by two businessmen
associated with the Talibovs named Vugar Abassov and Emin Uchar.

Abassov and Uchar partnered with Rza Talibov, his mother, and a cousin
in the only business in which they have ever been documented to be
shareholders: Nakhchivanbank, a local financial institution founded in
2008. The bank has since stopped disclosing its shareholders, leaving
it unclear whether the family is still involved, though Rza’s sister
Baharkhanim is a member of its supervisory board. If they are still
part owners of the institution, it is unclear how much they may be
earning.

The Laundromat Millions

But despite this lack of public records, leaked bank data from
Switzerland — part of the international Suisse Secrets investigation —
allowed reporters to document some of their wealth for the first time.
At their maximum in March 2011, the records show, Seymur’s Credit
Suisse account held $7.3 million, and Rza’s held $9.3 million.

The Suisse Secrets Investigation

Suisse Secrets is a collaborative journalism project based on leaked
bank account data from Swiss banking giant Credit Suisse.

The data was provided by an anonymous source to the German newspaper
Süddeutsche Zeitung, which shared it with OCCRP and 46 other media
partners around the world. Reporters on five continents combed through
thousands of bank records, interviewed insiders, regulators, and
criminal prosecutors, and dug into court records and financial
disclosures to corroborate their findings. The data covers over 18,000
accounts that were open from the 1940s until well into the last
decade. Together, they held funds worth more than $100 billion.

"I believe that Swiss banking secrecy laws are immoral,” the source of
the data said in a statement. “The pretext of protecting financial
privacy is merely a fig leaf covering the shameful role of Swiss banks
as collaborators of tax evaders. This situation enables corruption and
starves developing countries of much-needed tax revenue.”

Because the Credit Suisse data obtained by journalists is incomplete,
there are a number of important caveats to be kept in mind when
interpreting it. Read more about the project, where the data came
from, and what it means.

Because these figures only show the account balance at one point in
time, it’s impossible to know how much money passed through the
accounts over the years. But both brothers’ account numbers also
appear in two other leaks of banking data previously obtained by
OCCRP.

They show that, between 2007 and 2012, Rza and Seymur’s accounts at
Credit Suisse and several other banks received over a hundred separate
wire transfers worth a total of $20.5 million from two shell
companies, Murova Systems and Continus Corporation.

How much the Talibov children received from the Laundromat companies.

Both companies were identified as money laundering vehicles by Bosnian
prosecutors who looked into them as part of a human trafficking
investigation.

The leaked records from Credit Suisse also suggest an intriguing
connection to Cahan Holding: The powers of attorney on both Seymur and
Rza’s personal bank accounts were held by two Cahan employees.

These shell companies, which never did any substantive business, were
part of the Azerbaijani and Troika Laundromats, two massive money
laundering systems uncovered in previous OCCRP investigations.
Laundromats are essentially groups of connected shell companies that
send money around and around to each other, using many separate fake
transactions to obscure its origins.

“That’s incredibly unusual,” said Barrow, the financial crime
specialist who reviewed the transactions, explaining that they
contained multiple warning signs.

Most obviously, he said, was the origin of the money: shell companies
that registered no real business activity.

“Second problem, every single one of those payments is a round
figure,” Barrow said. “Business isn’t conducted that way. … Banks are
supposed to have monitoring in place that picks up on round figure
sums and flags them as suspicious.”

“And the other [suspicious] thing is when somebody is apparently doing
a massively wide variety of different businesses,” he said. “We saw
textiles and electronics going through the same company accounts. What
company does that? It makes no commercial sense whatsoever.”

For politically connected people, Barrow said, banks have a “legal
duty to do enhanced due diligence. Enhanced due diligence to establish
the source of wealth.”

But the money kept flowing, with the three Talibov children receiving
more and more until 2012, the last year that appears in the records.

An Inner Circle with Laundromat Access

Rza and Seymur Talibov weren’t the only members of the family to
receive money from the Laundromats. In 2012, an account held by their
sister, Baharkhanim Talibova, received $900,000 from Murova Systems
and another offshore shell company. Vasif Talibov’s nephew, Elnur
Talibov, received $77,000 from Murova Systems in his own Credit Suisse
account. The shell company also paid his tuition at College Du Leman,
an international boarding school in Geneva. And Vugar Abassov, the
Talibovs’ business partner, received $5.8 million from Murova and
Continus.

“Getting Acquainted” with Batumi

That January, Vasif Talibov paid a three-day visit to the seaside
Georgian resort city of Batumi, in the autonomous republic of Adjara.
According to the press office of the local government, his goal was to
“get acquainted with the economic and tourist[ic] potential of the
region.”

His elder son Rza, who accompanied him on the official trip, soon made
a personal real estate investment in the city, buying a historical
building just a few blocks from the beach for $1.5 million.

A few months later, Adjara representatives visited Nakhchivan and
signed a memorandum of economic cooperation between the two regions.

Afterwards, Rza wasted no time snapping up an adjacent 19th-century
building from the government through a special agreement with the
Adjara economic ministry. Though it was valued at over half a million
dollars, he was charged only a symbolic amount of sixty cents to
acquire it, in the interests of redevelopment. Rza also bought out
several people who already owned space in the building for another
$1.2 million.

He then merged the two buildings together to open a five-star hotel,
Divan Suites Batumi. According to an announcement by the city
administration, he would spend $10 million on its construction.

Rza also paid over $6 million to have a company owned by Emin Uchar,
who co-founded Nakhchivanbank with the family, build him an elite
villa in the city’s exclusive Green Cape neighborhood.

But the bulk of the family’s acquisitions were in Dubai.

By 2020, Vasif Talibov’s sons had acquired 11 properties in the
Emirate worth a total of at least $45 million today, including a
12-floor luxury hotel. According to a leak of real estate data
obtained by the non-profit research organization C4ADS, both brothers
held Emirati identification cards, indicating that they had residency
there.

None of these extravagant properties appear on the brothers’ social
media accounts. Unlike some other children of authoritarian rulers,
Seymur and Rza avoid displays of conspicuous wealth on their social
media pages, posting instead about their love for their country, their
father’s achievements, and their devotion to President Aliyev.

In one Twitter post last year, Rza shared a quote from Aliyev in large
block letters, apparently designed to underscore the regime’s
frugality.

“Our traditions, values, and lifestyle are our assets,” he wrote.

He didn’t mention the other ones.

https://urldefense.c...GpHNRuLpTuKQOw$
 



#72 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 October 2022 - 07:51 AM

BlankSpot, Sweden
Oct 10 2022
 
 
Data analysis shows a major victory for Azerbaijan’s digital army
 
Last week the Swedish news agency TT reported that Azerbaijan had discovered what it claimed to be mass graves from prior conflicts in the disputed Nagorno-Karabach region. At the time, TT was unaware that the social media campaign surrounding this news was well planned by the Azerbaijanis. Blankspot has analyzed how the Azerbaijani regime uses bots and troll factories to propagate sympathetic views towards the country.
Av RASMUS CANBÄCK 10 oktober, 2022

On October 5, the Swedish TT news agency put out an article that Azerbaijan had found mass graves in Nagorno-Karabakh. The story got republished in about fifteen major Swedish media outlets, among some of the largest in Sweden.

The article’s primary source was Hikmet Hajiyev, personal adviser on foreign affairs to Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, who wrote a tweet. The content of his tweet was shared over a short period on September 19 thousands of times on Twitter, both from Hajiyev’s account and others with similar content.

After criticism from many people, the Swedish-Armenian historian and peace and conflict researcher Vahagn Avedian about the factuality of the text and whether Hikmet Hajiyev is a credible source, concequnelty the appointed head of news for foreign affairs at TT, Pontus Ahlmqvist, regretted the mistake.

On Twitter, he wrote: ”We generally try to include context and caveats when we quote information from authoritarian regimes that we have not been able to verify ourselves. The Armenian information on war crimes could, for example, have been included here. We take the criticism to heart.”

The news came just days after top diplomats from several countries, including the US, France and Norway, condemned Azerbaijan for gross war crimes during the September 13-14 invasion of Armenia. There is no TT article about this.

The question of how a tweet from an authoritarian regime could go through TT’s fact-checking can say something about the Azerbaijani regime’s tactics on social media.

With the help of Twitter user @Bedig_A , who developed software that utilizes Twitter’s publicly available APIs, we provide insight into how the Azerbaijani regime’s propaganda operates on Twitter. The data Blankspot investigated the source of a tweet, the number of interactions, engagements and connections between different accounts. For example, whether one account interacts with another and at what times this happens.

In other words, the software can produce statistical analysis about different users’ behaviour on Twitter. Based on the data provided, we looked into different areas: 1) signs are showing how professional ”troll factories control the accounts”. 2) Signs that there are bots and 3) Indication of state-coordinated information campaigns.

This has been done by partly focusing on particular #hashtags with many apparent tweets in a short time intervals, accounts that tweet a lot without getting much interaction, and tweets from regime representatives that get rapid non-organic spread.

The analysis has been based on periods when there was war or conflict and just before and after. For example, when Azerbaijan attacked Armenia on September 13-14.

png7AG3z12F0z.png
Chart shows top accounts that spread #NoPelosi (see text below)

 

Signs of troll factories

One purpose of troll factories is to make particular #hashtags and messages trend. One such example is #ArmenianVandalism, which was the main message on October 5 when TT picked up the news about mass graves.

Our analysis shows that the tag #ArmenianVandalism, which normally occurs about ten times a day, started to increase on September 27. This was the same day the EU condemned Azerbaijan for the war crimes. Activity then increased to approximately 300 occurrences per day and remained there until October 5, when it suddenly spiked to almost 2000 posts, only to sink to 300 again the following day.

The top accounts spreading this hashtag shared some characteristics: they had generic Azeri names, followed by numbers. They either had no profile picture or a profile picture of a young male person; some had the ruling party logo. Almost all had relatively few followers, but enough to not seem like a startup. Most were started between one and six months ago.

Between the hours of 16:50-17:37, #ArmenianVandalism increased through 261 individual accounts, with several of the accounts we looked at tweeting the message upwards of 20 times within the time span.

Soon after, it was picked up by the news agency TT.

photo_5899928456790129768_x.jpg?resize=4Chart shows how #ArmenianVandalism hastag gained momentum on October 5th

Another example is the user @LiyevAqsin, who has occasionally been banned from Twitter. Since its creation during the Nagorno-Karabakh war in October 2020, the account has tweeted no less than 58,200 times. As a rule, the tweets are brief and exclusively praise the Azerbaijani regime.

Almost all tweets are posted between 09:00 in the morning and 18:00 local time, i.e. a normal working day by Baku standards.

On average, the account is spent on Twitter about four hours per day spread over 7 days a week, but the figure is higher if you start from working days when it is actually active.

The third example is the campaign against US Democratic Senator Bob Menendez, who, on September 28, presented a proposal to ban US money supporting the Azerbaijani defence.

During #CorruptPolitician, 7,246 likes and 22,504 tweets were generated from 1,514 accounts, of which 1,452 were unique. The average time between each tweet was 2 seconds. Several regime representatives attended.

A fourth example is the hashtag #NoPelosi, which was established on September 19 when US Congress Speaker Nancy Pelosi was on a state visit to Armenia. In connection with that, she made unusually strong statements against Azerbaijan as a result of the invasion a couple of days earlier.

The analysis shows that on September 18, #NoPelosi began to be used. Then it was tweeted 205 times with seven minutes between each tweet – on average. On September 19, it increased to 2,370 tweets, with 27 seconds between each tweet. One account, @Darya111991 tweeted #NoPelosi 519 times, which equates to an average of three tweets per minute on September 19 in the 24 hours.

png7ClKQF2DX_.png
Examples of the above accounts, back in June 2021, that appear to have abnormal patterns on Twitter. Some accounts have occasionally been suspended. Thus the green bar is sometimes shorter than the other two.

 

Signs of bots

The case with @Darya111991 shows signs of the use of bots.

Azerbaijani bots typically have generic usernames which often include many numbers. They tweet a lot and for a long time and their tweets are typically not elaborate in content – in other words, they do not appear unique.

Bots were involved in propagating both the #ArmenianVandalism and #NoPelosi hashtags, but they are generally used for a longer period of time.

One example, the user @NarnialsFree tweeted 24 hours a day for 170 days. For 510 days this account tweeted mainly during working hours. A total of 24,498 tweets.

There are many more examples. However, the intensity of tweeting increases when special messages are to be communicated in times of crisis and conflict.

 

pngShF3fEX9G7.png
The above map shows how these accounts have shared the same tweet about Cawa Media. It all started from Zaur Ahmadov’s account. This indicates that the tweet did not go organically but in a single trajectory through content Retweeting. A tweet is usually spread in several stages through shares.
 

Signs of coordinated information campaigns

In addition to the use of bots and troll factories, ‘real people’ with accounts are also needed to make a substantial impact. In the case of the TT article, it was Hikmet Hajiyev who was the source, but his is just one of many Azerbaijani accounts.

The information campaigns that have had the greatest impact are where bots, troll factories and accounts run by real people all cooperate, as was the case in #ArmenianVandalism, #CorruptPolitician and #NoPelosi.

On the other hand, there is coordinated cooperation without the other components as well. The dividing line between organic and artificial propagation in such cases is possibly not great.

One example of this is from December 2021 when the Azerbaijani Ambassador to Sweden, Zaur Ahmadov, (a known critic of Blankspot) tweeted a video by Cawa Media which – according to Azerbaijani rhetoric – showed Armenian war crimes in Nagorno-Karabakh. Only one day earlier, Blankspot had published an article about Cawa Media participating in an invitational trip to Azerbaijan which was followed up with an article about a seminar at an Azerbaijani propaganda conference in Brussels.

Zaur Ahmadov’s tweet received 130 shares and 227 likes. According to our analysis, 83 of these occurred within 58 seconds. Unlike the previous examples in the article, the vast majority of participating accounts here appear to be genuine, i.e. run by real people. 

photo_5904707209202350324_x.jpg?resize=4Example of an account supposedly run by a troll factory. It joined Twitter on 10-10-2020 and till today it tweeted 58,513 tweets

Among those who shared the video in those 58 seconds are Fuad Muradov (Azerbaijan’s Minister of Diaspora Affairs), a number of ambassadors, the PR manager of the state oil company SOCAR and several government employees in Baku.

What is striking is that all shares originated from Zaur Ahmadov’s account. Thus there were no retweets from those who had shared it. Normally, tweets are shared by one person sharing something which leads to a new follower sharing it further and so on. 

It is therefore likely that the sharing of the tweet was planned through internal channels.

Since then, Cawa Media has frequently published articles about Azerbaijan, and despite there being a war between Armenia and Azerbaijan, the organization has also managed to be event photographers for the Armenian embassy in Stockholm.

The fact indicates that through well-planned coordination on social media, Azerbaijan can get away with its tactics without any criticism from the Swedish news outlets due to the lack of attention and interest the Caucasus region gets.

Ambassador Zaur Ahmadov used the article from TT as  an indication that Swedish media are covering what is happening in Azerbaijan at all.

One reason for TT’s lack of source criticism by other newsrooms is that the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh is considered a peripheral part of Europe. It often falls outside the sphere of interest of the Western media.

Correction (2022-10-10, 21:17): One Twitter account was wrongly pointed out as an example of likely being a bot. The example is deleted.

Av RASMUS CANBÄCK
 


#73 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 01 November 2022 - 09:36 AM

pngTE54sbNtBI.png
Oct 29 2022
 
 
Is Netflix Guilty of Whitewashing Human Rights?
Posted byMane Berikyan
 
pngTJ5R3rMsmy.png

 

A region whose presence in the Western media landscape has been close to nonexistent, the Caucasus rarely finds itself the subject of the U.S. entertainment industry. However, a rather unsettling surprise greets viewers upon viewing Netflix’s recent spy action filmThe Gray Man, featuring A-list actors like Ryan Gosling, Chris Evans and Ana de Armas. 

Azerbaijan, one of the least-free countries in the world whose human rights record can be considered deplorable at best, is featured prominently as the setting for a sizable portion of the plot. Released earlier this summer, the Netflix original follows the story of CIA agent “Sierra Six,” played by Ryan Gosling, who uncovers corrupt secrets about his superior and triggers a global manhunt after him.

Within the first thirty minutes of the film, the words “Baku, Azerbaijan” fill up the screen in bold silver letters against the backdrop of a shimmering Baku skyline. Several minutes later, the cameras pan over a large Azerbaijani flag, featured front and center in a military funeral alongside Azerbaijani soldiers, flags and — interestingly — a Russian Orthodox priest leading the service (Azerbaijan is a majority-Muslim country). 

The scene, pun not intended, looks like it’s straight out a movie. Only, if the movie was an advertisement for oil-rich, dictatorial countries with something to hide.

Notably, the scenes set in Baku are not filmed in Azerbaijan, but in the Czech Republic. Azerbaijan’s unmistakable Flame Towers, the three skyscrapers that have come to symbolize its rather sudden climb to wealth, are added into the scenes set in Baku with computer-generated imagery (CGI).

The release of the film comes one year after Azerbaijan announced a partnership with Netflix, the world’s leading streaming platform.

The prominent incorporation of Baku as the setting for a sizable portion of the plot is particularly important when contextualized alongside Azerbaijan’s infamous black caviar diplomacy — source of the “biggest corruption scandal in the history of the Council of Europe,” according to the European Stability Initiative — and overarching human rights whitewashing strategy. 

The film merely features the shimmering Baku skyline without bringing any known revenue to the country or creating local job opportunities, indicative of a broader whitewashing agenda at hand. One may argue it creates the impression of a paid promotion that Netflix loaned its ad space to.

The concept is even more troubling when considering Azerbaijan’s atrocious human rights record, which deteriorates every year. Azerbaijan not only continues to severely and violently repress its own citizens’ fundamental human rights, but as recently as 2020, it also launched an ethnic cleansing campaign against the civilian population of the autonomous Nagorno Karabakh region. Azerbaijan has since openly invaded neighboring Armenia, following Russia’s footsteps in its war against neighboring Ukraine. 

It is therefore imperative that influential media companies do not give a platform to countries like Azerbaijan, as promotion in an implicitly positive light without additional context will directly benefit the brutal dictator in power and his clan. This will in turn fuel human rights violations and put vulnerable people further at risk.

Regarding the cooperation with Netflix, perhaps foreshadowing this turn of events, Azerbaijani Culture Minister Anar Karimov expressed last year his intentions to “fully demonstrate the film potential of Azerbaijan to the world,” emphasizing the importance of Russia, a close partner of Azerbaijan, in this process, as well. It appears Azerbaijani investments in soft power are now materializing.

Despite being one of the most expensive films Netflix has produced, The Gray Man has not fared well with critics and audiences. However, it now retains the ranking of #1 Netflix film of the year and #4 of all time. 

Meanwhile, other countries in the region have also made significant headway in Hollywood. For instance, the 2021 film Fast and Furious 9 was filmed, in part, on the streets of Tbilisi, Georgia, generating buzz in the country and receiving praise from Georgian authorities, who took credit for the development. The project generated nearly $10 million for the country and created hundreds of local jobs.

Unlike its two South Caucasus neighbors, Armenia has yet to make such progress in the international film industry. 

For instance, the 2016 film The Promise, a story about the Armenian Genocide, was temporarily available on Netflix and was celebrated by Armenian communities worldwide. However, an influx of negative reviews, allegedly orchestrated by genocide deniers, immediately tanked the film’s ratings.

Looking forward, while each country pursues its own spotlight on the international media stage, Azerbaijan continues seeking new avenues to consolidate dictatorial power in the Aliyev clan’s bloody hands and whitewash its human rights record internationally. 

When human rights concerns arise, however, it is up to media companies and the agency of their consumers to act responsibly and consciously in light of the global implications they perpetrate.

https://www.glimpsef...g-human-rights/



#74 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 December 2022 - 08:07 AM

Asbarez.com
 
With Section 907 Waiver Azerbaijan Made Hundreds of Millions in U.S. Contracts, While U.S. Generals Profited from Baku
 
pngpUQs_Ivcuf.png
The Washington Post’s lead online story on Dec. 5 about how Baku profited from U.S. contracts during the Afghanistan war

As a result of the waiver of Section 907 by successive administrations, Azerbaijan made hundreds of millions of dollars in United States and NATO contracts, using the Caspian country as a route for delivery of goods to Afghanistan during the height of the war. At the same time, retired U.S. generals and other personnel profited from Baku after their tours of duty ended in the U.S.-NATO schemes.

Beginning with George W. Bush Administration, which started the war in Afghanistan, all other administrations—Obama, Trump and currently Biden—have waived Section 907, which calls for restrictions on U.S. aid to Azerbaijan, and entered into military agreements with Aliyev’s murderous regime.

This is the subject of an extensive expose published on Monday as its lead online story by The Washington Post, which details the trail of money flowing into Azerbaijan’s controversial Silk Way Airlines—and its parent the Silk Way Group—as well as how two retired U.S. Air Force general sought to cash in on their involvement from Baku, and Silk Way, which attempted to hire them as consultants after they left the U.S. military. The Washington Post also details how it sued, under the Freedom of Information Act, to obtain classified records showing the Air Force Review Boards Agency attempts to block one of the general’s contracts, due to conflicts with U.S. national security interests.

In the Post piece, entitled “Fearing Scandal, Air Force Blocked Generals’ Foreign Consulting Deals,” reporters Craig Whitlock and Nate Jones outline how despite concerns from the CIA and State Department about Azerbaijan’s authoritarian and corrupt practices, the U.S. military leaders looked to Azerbaijan and embraced its president Ilham Aliyev at the height of the war in Afghanistan.

“Setting aside concerns about Azerbaijan’s culture of corruption, Pentagon officials persuaded Aliyev to open his country’s borders and airspace to critical U.S. and NATO supply routes to Afghanistan. In exchange, U.S. officials promised a closer diplomatic partnership with Aliyev and steered $369 million in defense contracts to Silk Way Airlines, an Azerbaijan cargo carrier that U.S. investigators say was controlled by the government,” the Post reported.

“Two U.S. Air Force generals — Duncan McNabb and William Fraser III — who oversaw the supply routes from 2008 to 2014 later tried to cash in on their Azerbaijan connections. Upon retiring from active duty, the four-star generals negotiated valuable consulting deals with Silk Way Airlines, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post under the Freedom of Information Act. One of them stood to earn $5,000 a day,” added the Post.

According to The Washington Post, when the collaboration between the U.S. and Azerbaijan began, Baku wanted to charge the U.S. tariff, which the Pentagon refused.

“The supply routes paid off for Azerbaijan in other ways, however. Silk Way Airlines, seeking to break into the U.S. market, received $269 million in U.S. defense contracts during McNabb’s three-year tenure at Transcom to transfer supplies from Europe to Afghanistan and Iraq, according to Air Force records,” the Post reported.

McNabb and Fraser, in successive terms, were in charge of the U.S. Transportation Command, known as Transcom from 2008 to 2014. As heads of Transcom, they oversaw what the Post reported as being 25 percent of American transport of non-lethal material to Afghanistan through Azerbaijan.

While, according to the Post, McNabb did not apply for government approval when he signed a $10,000 monthly consulting contract with Silk Way, Fraser, when seeking to sign a contract that would have paid him a reported $5,000 daily salary, sought U.S. clearance, which raised alarms and red flags at the Pentagon and the State Department, which voiced their concerns to the Air Force agency about Silk Way’s ties to the Aliyev regime.

After Fraser did not receive approval for his contract, in a memo to the Air Force agency, he made remarks that were perceived as warnings, according to the Post.

“The general said he believed there would be ‘blowback for the United States’ if the Air Force didn’t let him work for Silk Way,” according to Fraser’s memo.

Read the entire article by The Washington Post.

 

 

https://asbarez.com/...-hPISp-kidhysjA

 


#75 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 January 2023 - 08:29 AM

     When Azerbaijan Opens Wide its Purse,

            Money-Grabbers Rush to Take Their Share

            By Harut Sassounian

            Publisher, The California Courier

            www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com

 

Journalist Till Bruckner wrote a lengthy investigative article regarding Azerbaijan handing some of its vast petrodollars to politicians, businessmen, and universities around the world. Even prominent individuals and institutions prostitute themselves when a huge amount of money is thrown at them. Bruckner’s article, “Corruptistan Azerbaijan: How to Build Yourself a Stealth Lobbyist, Azerbaijani style,” was posted on the website of “Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project.”

The article states: “The rise of Brenda Shaffer, a scholar and oft-quoted expert in the field of energy politics illustrates just how vulnerable the American foreign policy establishment is to manipulation by foreign agents. Supported by an overseas regime and an assorted network of overt and undercover lobbyists, she used oil money to build her academic credentials, then in turn used those credentials to promote Azerbaijan’s agendas through Congressional testimony, dozens of newspaper op-eds and media appearances, countless think tank events, and even scholarly publications. She’s still doing it.”

When testifying before the House of Representatives’ Committee on International Relations in 2001, Shaffer was introduced as “the director of the Caspian Studies Program and a post-doctoral fellow in the international security program at the Belfort [Belfer] Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government.”

In her remarks, Shaffer asked Congress to repeal Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act that barred direct US aid to the government of Azerbaijan. Members of Congress did not know that “the Caspian Studies Program she headed at Harvard was set up in 1999 through a $1 million grant from the US Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce and a consortium of oil and gas companies led by Exxon, Mobil, and Chevron, all of which had commercial interests in the region. The chamber of commerce is a pro-Azerbaijan pressure group whose Board of Directors includes a vice president of SOCAR, the Azerbaijan state-owned energy company, and top lobbyists for BP and Chevron.”

The chamber issued a press release in 1999, stating that the Caspian Studies Program’s aim was to “help shape informed policy,” regarding Azerbaijan. The Kennedy School of Government, in its own press release, announced that Graham T. Allison, Director of Harvard’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, and Pres. Ilham Aliyev, then first vice president of Azerbaijan’s oil company, SOCAR, would speak at its inaugural conference.

In 2000, then-President Heydar Aliyev attended an Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce event, telling the guests: “I cheer the opening of a new chair at Harvard University relating to Azerbaijan and [the] Caspian area. I am thankful for the assistance of American-Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce rendered for it.” Allison, a former Assistant Secretary of Defense and Dean of Harvard’s Kennedy School, was removed from the chamber’s Board of Trustees after OCCRP pointed out his name.

OCCRP repeatedly asked the chamber for a copy of its financial statements, however, the chamber did not provide them, which is illegal.

The chamber listed such prominent individuals as “Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, James A. Baker III, Brent Scowcroft and John Sununu” as members of its “Honorary Council of Advisors.”

Shaffer “led the Caspian Studies Program until 2005. During her tenure, she wrote 14 op-eds for leading U.S. and Israeli newspapers including the International Herald Tribune and the Jerusalem Post. Most called on American policy makers to pay more attention to the region. One exhorted the United States to stop funding for the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh.” In May 2006, journalist and lobbying expert Ken Silverstein wrote an article titled, “Academics for Hire,” in Harper’s Magazine, accusing prominent academics of performing “intellectual acrobatics on behalf of the [Caspian] region’s rulers.” He singled out Shaffer for especially harsh criticism.

Silverstein accused Harvard’s Caspian Studies Program of lacking “intellectual integrity,” highlighting its connection with Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce and specifically pointed out “Shaffer’s 2001 plea to Congress to repeal sanctions against Azerbaijan.”

Silverstein cautioned in his article: “Caspian watchers beware: the next time you see or hear an ‘independent’ American expert talking about how the region’s rulers are implementing bold reforms, check the expert’s credentials to see just how independent he or she truly is.”

Bruckner wrote: The following month, “the International Herald Tribune ran its third Shaffer op-ed, about ethnic Azerbaijanis and other minorities in Iran.” Since then, Silverstein outed her as an “academic for hire whose career was fueled by Azerbaijani lobbying outfits and Western oil companies invested in Azerbaijan.”

Bruckner complained to the editors of the New York Times, Washington Post, Reuters, Bloomberg, Foreign Affairs Journal, and Wall Street Journal for publishing Shaffer’s op-ed articles without disclosing her connections to Azerbaijan.

Shaffer also frequently participated in think tank panel discussions. Two days after Azerbaijan’s 2013 fraudulent presidential election, Shaffer spoke at Carnegie Endowment for International Affairs, praising the repressive country’s “vibrant press,” its fierce political debates, and its “realistic” voters!

“During December 2014 alone, Shaffer appeared on TV screens via Fox Business and Al Jazeera America, and commented on energy issues in print via the Jerusalem Post, London Times, The Australian, NPR, and Foreign Policy magazine. (Only weeks earlier, Foreign Policy itself had run a piece on Azerbaijan’s lobbying efforts by a different author that mentioned Shaffer’s SOCAR connection),” wrote Bruckner.

It is shameful that think tanks, universities, and politicians eagerly take the money offered to them by Azerbaijan, thereby encouraging the repressive regime to continue giving large sums to cover up its human rights violations.



#76 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 January 2023 - 08:25 AM

euobserver
Jan 18 2023
 
 
 
 
EU-spin campaign blows up in Azerbaijan's face
 
 

A distinguished Australian scientist says he was duped into doing Azerbaijan propaganda, in a PR fiasco that sheds light on shady spin tactics in Brussels.

Professor Bill Laurance from James Cook University in Cairns told EUobserver that a London-based PR firm called BTP+Advisers tricked him into signing an inflammatory op-ed paid for by Azerbaijan's government.

BTP+Advisers then pitched it to EUobserver in Brussels and to the National Interest magazine in Washington, on grounds of ecological concern.

We rejected it, but National Interest was due to publish it when Laurance found out about Azerbaijan, pulled his signature, and publicly denounced the British PR firm.

"I asked if they [BTP+Advisers] had any vested financial interest in the matter and they told me they were working for the government of Azerbaijan," Laurance said by phone on Monday (16 January).

"It [the op-ed] won't go out, at least not in my name," Laurance said.

And he would never again work with BTP+Advisers, whom he now described as "radioactive", he added.

The proposed op-ed in question rehearsed Azeri propaganda that eco-protesters had blocked a mountain pass to stop pollution by Armenian mines.

"It takes real bravery to stand up for what is right ... these protestors deserve our support," it said.

But the full story is that Azerbaijan's state-endorsed blockade of the Lachin pass in the Nagorno-Karabakh region in Azerbaijan over the past month has cut off 120,000 ethnic Armenians living there, causing a humanitarian emergency.

The "inhumane siege" amounts to forced displacement, Armenian diplomats say.

The EU is also urging Azerbaijan to show mercy.

"Azerbaijan could take measures that are within its jurisdiction to ensure freedom and security of movement along the [Lachin] corridor," the EU foreign service told EUobserver. Baku's blockade was causing "significant distress" to local people, it added.

But the proposed op-ed didn't mention any of that, while depicting Azerbaijan, a draconian petro-dictatorship, as a haven for grass-roots eco-movements.

Azerbaijan president Ilham Aliyev has crushed genuine civil society at home.

His regime is also known by real environmental campaigners, such as Greenpeace, for pools of oil left floating on the sea, heaps of burning garbage in Baku, and undrinkable water.

But BTP+Advisers made it look as if Laurance, an eminently neutral "environmental scientist and campaigner who is distinguished research professor and Australian Laureate at James Cook University in Cairns", was independently weighing in on Aliyev's side.

It made it look like scientific truth had taken sides in an ugly ethnic conflict.

Brussels is no stranger to shady influence campaigns, one of which exploded into a global scandal in the Qatargate bribery affair in the EU Parliament last year.

Lobbyists routinely hire former EU officials or other VIPs to gain insider clout and PR firms seek out big names to speak for their clients in op-eds that were largely drafted by the PR company's own staff.

The tobacco industry first involved serious scientists in lobby campaigns in the 1960s, in tactics later copied by oil and pharmaceutical industries.

But for all that, it's highly unusual to try to make a real academic into an unwitting glove-puppet for a dictator.

And pro-transparency campaigners struggled to think of a precedent when asked by this website, making BTP+Advisers and Laurance a novel case.

In one parallel, high-profile scientists were tricked by a climate-change denying group called Creative Society into appearing in pro-denial online events last April, Greenpeace noted.

But science-washing typically involved dishonest scientists acting in bad faith, Greenpeace said, giving its investigation into US lobbying in 2015 as an example.

In an insight into PR modus operandi, Laurance said he had worked with BTP+Advisers on problem-free op-eds in the past.

He was never offered money, he said.

And BTP+Advisers had assured him they were acting out of genuine ecological concern and had privileged information about facts on the ground in Nagorno-Karabakh, the professor said.

Transparency

EUobserver has, in good faith, also published four op-eds sent by the firm over the past four years, in the name of people ranging from the prime minister of Montenegro to a New York rabbi.

We also once published a — clearly labelled — stakeholder piece by Azerbaijan's environment minister.

BTP+Advisers has offices in Belgrade, Kampala, London, Paris, and Washington.

There is no suggestion that it broke any laws or registration requirements.

Its CEO, Mark Pursey, also told EUobserver that it didn't mean to deceive anyone.

The Laurance imbroglio was a one-off human error, he said.

"We should have told professor Laurance up front that we work for the government of Azerbaijan", Pursey said. "You may not choose to believe me, but this was a genuine mistake," he said.

In all other cases, BTP+Advisers openly declared it worked for Azerbaijan, Pursey claimed.

But it didn't say so when it pitched the "Laurance" op-ed to EUobserver.

It doesn't mention Azerbaijan on its website or list it as a client in open-source lobbyist registries around the world.

And Pursey's comments to this website were his first public ones on his new Baku contract.

Pursey took the job in 2020 "because they [Azerbaijan] needed help when the war started," he told EUobserver, referring to Azerbaijan's reconquest of Nagorno-Karabakh from Armenians, which cost thousands of lives.

Meanwhile, Azerbaijan has, in recent years, already earned itself a bad name for dirty lobbying tricks, such as lavish trips and gifts for European politicians, in a practice dubbed "caviar diplomacy".

Its obfuscating answers to EUobserver's questions about BTP+Advisers also showed a less than transparent face.

"Azerbaijan does not pay any lobbyist companies in Brussels," Ramil Taghiyev, Azerbaijan's EU embassy spokesman, told EUobserver when asked if his government worked with the London spin doctors.

He implied our story was empty muck-raking in the wake of the Qatargate affair.

"It is clear that topics related to certain European institutions that are mired in corruption are popular now and your interest seems to emerge from this," Taghiyev said.

Azerbaijan's embassy in the UK didn't reply to questions.

Mess

"It's not great, I agree with you ... it's a mess", BTP+Advisers' Pursey said, referring to the optics of the Laurance incident for him and his client.

But for Armenians, there are bigger issues at stake.

"Historically, Azerbaijan's caviar diplomacy has wielded them favourable and imbalanced media coverage," Armenia's foreign ministry spokesman Vahan Hunanyan said.

"Regardless of the unlimited lobbying budgets deployed by Azerbaijan, it has become difficult for anyone to justify their ongoing violations of international humanitarian law," he added.

 


#77 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 24 February 2023 - 09:22 AM

Panorama
Armenia - Feb 23 2023
 
 
'Caviar Diplomacy': What is the price of Europe's silence on Azerbaijan's use of phosphorus weapons?
 

The Armenian version of the report "Caviar Diplomacy: How Azerbaijan Silenced the Council of Europe” can shed some light on the silence and indifference of international organizations in the wake of Azerbaijan’s months-long blockade of the Lachin Corridor, the sole road linking Artsakh to Armenia.

On February 19, the birthday of prominent Armenian writer Hovhannes Tumanyan, which is also celebrated as Book Giving Day in Armenia, the presentation of the report translated into Armenian by journalist Siranuysh Muradyan, who has covered the Council of Europe activities for many years, and published by the Newmag Publishing House was held in Yerevan.

52696201369_7ed894e557_b(1).jpg

The book's cover features former President of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) Pedro Agramunt, former Chairman of the European People's Party Group in PACE Luca Volontè and German MEPs Karin Strenz and Axel Fischer, who were deprived of their parliamentary immunity, under the gaze of dictator Ilham Aliyev.

Experts of the think tank European Stability Initiative (ESI) identified European officials involved in the "caviar diplomacy": they received bribes from Azerbaijan to lobby for the country, remain silent or defend Baku's interests. ESI revealed the facts in two reports for 2011-2012 and for 2016-2017. The report was followed by the resignation of Pedro Agramunt as PACE president. Azerbaijan has not been held to account for its corrupt activity to date.

Siranuysh Muradyan began translating the 156-page report back during the 2020 war in Artsakh.

"I want the Armenian readership to know about Baku’s disgraceful activity. I want the people to know the price of Europe's silence on the use of phosphorus munitions during the war, the use of weapons banned by the European Convention or the bombing of a maternity hospital in Artsakh," she said.

Despite the ongoing prosecutions in Germany following the corruption revelations and Italy’s conviction of former MEP Luca Volontè, who received a €2.5 million bribe from two officials from Azerbaijan, Muradyan is unhappy with the response of law enforcement agencies in the PACE member states to the scandalous revelations.

"This research has to bring some consequences. For more than a decade, the names and photos of the corrupt persons have been disclosed in the reports, however the results are totally unpleasing. Several investigations have caused a stir in the Bundestag now. There is also the 4-year prison sentence handed down to Luca Volontè in Italy. But the tentacles of Baku’s corruption scandal are everywhere. Therefore, European and German law enforcement authorities should thoroughly investigate whether Otto Hauser, Alexander Funk, Kay Wegner, Daniela Ludwig, Markus Held and others were also involved in the scandal," Muradyan stated.

The journalist-translator stresses if a PACE delegate is involved in a corruption scandal, it means the whole Parliamentary Assembly is also involved in it, as PACE is committed to imposing sanctions for violations of the European Convention. Meanwhile, Azerbaijan continues blocking the Lachin Corridor and creating a humanitarian crisis in Artsakh amid the salience of the world community, while PACE claims to promote human rights, rule of law and democracy.

"Which of these principles is now respected in the Berdzor Corridor? The European Stability Initiative experts, too, constantly talk about the weak response following their revelations, there are many persons who must face prosecution,” Muradyan told Panorama.am, stressing that new facts have been added to those presented in the report over the recent years, the PACE Anti-Corruption Body has released a 200-page report which reveals the disgraceful picture in the Council of Europe.

 

"We normally link the caviar diplomacy to Azerbaijani corruption. But we should remember that it is not one-sided, it is also about European and Western corruption. To-be diplomats should be well aware that when representing the interests of their country they may meet with people who have personal interests," said political analyst Tevan Poghosyan, speaking about the importance of translating the report and stressing the need to work with the right institutions.

Former MP Naira Karapetyan, who has worked at PACE for many years, stressed that she was a witness to the published book and saw the developments following the backstage agreements.

"PACE has now forgotten everything that got flesh and blood in 2017, when these revelations resulted in stricter rules of conduct for parliamentarian, including declaration of assets, monetary limits on gifts. It was supposed to restrain Azerbaijan a bit, but amid the game of world powers, Azerbaijan stood with Ukraine and got the green light and the support of many, becoming a direct fuel partner of Europe," Karapetyan said, urging the Armenian delegation to make intense efforts to disclose Azerbaijan’s actions to PACE.

 

Artsakh’s Foreign Minister Sergey Ghazaryan strongly believes that even now the Azerbaijani leadership spares no effort to “buy” the support of the Council of Europe and to silence critics of Azerbaijan's human rights violations and poor state of democracy.

Ghazaryan also underscored in his speech at the book presentation that during the 44-day war and after it the international structures continued turning a blind eye to the crimes committed by Azerbaijan against the Armenian people, which has resulted in Azerbaijan’s brazen conduct to the extent that the Azerbaijani troops are now stationed on Armenia’s sovereign territory and Baku has been keeping Artsakh and its 120,000 people under siege for over two months amid the inaction of the institutions claiming to defend universal human rights.

The top photo is from the page of the American University of Armenia.

https://www.panorama...rbaijan/2798054



#78 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 July 2023 - 08:23 AM

Armenpress.am
 
Azerbaijan continues notorious Caviar Diplomacy for bribing European officials, but more cautiously – warns expert
 

1115677.jpg 15:32, 18 July 2023

YEREVAN, JULY 18, ARMENPRESS. The Azerbaijani government has been bribing European lawmakers in an attempt to conceal its poor human rights record.

 

Azerbaijan's infamous “Caviar Diplomacy” of systematic bribing to downplay its human rights record has led to investigations and convictions.

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on July 13 on recommendations for reform of the European Parliament’s rules on transparency, integrity, accountability and anti-corruption.

 

The resolution mentions violations by various countries and organizations, including the Azerbaijani government’s actions. 

 

“…whereas Azerbaijan has conducted large-scale influence operations, involving strong suspicions of corruption, against members of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe; whereas Azerbaijan has managed to avert probes into its elections and whitewash its human rights record,” reads clause T of the resolution.

Speaking to ARMENPRESS, expert on Azerbaijan, former MP and former Armenian delegate to PACE Tatev Hayrapetyan warned that Azerbaijan will continue its practices of bribing European officials, but more cautiously.

 

“The scandalous reports prove that Azerbaijan’s actions in PACE involve a broad network and that the head of the Azerbaijani delegation Samad Seyidov is directly involved in criminal activity. When we were going to Strasbourg the Azerbaijanis were already acting very cautiously. Nonetheless, the facts remain and Seyidov continues to lead the Azerbaijani delegation,” Hayrapetyan told ARMENPRESS.

With the scandalous ousting of Pedro Agramunt as President of PACE in 2017 not stopping the practices of the Aliyev regime, the Caviar Diplomacy continues to this day, the expert on Azerbaijan warned.

Agramunt and many other officials served at PACE for a long time and their partiality contributed to pro-Azeri wordings which did not reflect the situation neither on Azeri domestic developments not around the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. Eventually all packages are collected and Baku makes a tool out of it. The facts are disclosed, perpetrators are prosecuted, but the huge damage remains, she said.

“Azerbaijan isn’t criticized for its numerous political prisoners and human rights violations, whereas European countries get lambasted for the same occurrences. Turns out there are good and bad despots for Europe, with Aliyev being the so-called acceptable despot in this case, which in turn unleashes him even more in our region. Moreover, the Azerbaijanis show that the PACE resolutions mean nothing to them, they disregard the organizations where they themselves have membership. Should these organizations display principled approach, they would have considered ousting or suspending Azerbaijan, forcing Azerbaijan to respect the European resolutions,” Hayrapetyan said.

If the briber remains unpunished and those involved in scandals remain in office, then we are dealing with a unilateral punishment, when only those who are bribed are being punished. But this doesn’t mean that the bribers will stop, the expert said.

She warned that the Azerbaijanis will act more cautiously to try to find alternative sources.

On one hand the fact of bribery exists, but on the other hand the representatives of the democratic Europe travel to Baku to shake President Aliyev’s hand and describe him as a “reliable partner” in the context of diversifying gas supplies, whereas this is in parallel with the “gas bluff” topic, which to some extent impacts the EU policy in South Caucasus.

But facts show that Azerbaijan doesn’t even have the required gas reserves to supply the necessary volumes to entire Europe. Azerbaijan itself is buying gas from Iran, Turkmenistan, Russia, and is often re-selling Russian gas. Hayrapetyan said that this major deal involves the Europeans thinking that they are diversifying Russian gas by using Azeri gas, but are actually using Russian energy carrier, which is supplied via Azeri pipelines.

“It’s absurd that Europe is sanctioning Russia but is supporting the aggressor, dictatorial Azerbaijan in South Caucasus, showing that Azerbaijan is its partner in our region. EU has always had reforms agendas with Armenia and Georgia, and an energy cooperation agenda with Azerbaijan, whereas reforms have no effect in case of Azerbaijan,” the expert said.

Manvel Margaryan

 

 

https://armenpress.a...3oAUCTHYBj3Rz8U



#79 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 16 November 2023 - 10:00 AM

Cherwell.org
Oxford University Student Newspaper
Oct 16 2023
 
 
Oxford centre with mystery £10M donor and family links to autocratic ruler silent on regime’s imprisonment of LSE academic
 
 


16th October 2023


The Oxford Nizami Ganjavi Centre (ONGC) is funded by an anonymous £10 million donation and has on its board the sister-in-law of President Aliyev, Azerbaijan’s autocratic ruler. The makeup of the centre’s board and the University’s refusal to identify the donor have drawn criticism from academics concerned about the preservation of academic freedom.

This comes amidst the ongoing imprisonment of Dr Gubad Ibadoghlu, an LSE academic and government critic arrested in Azerbaijan this summer on charges condemned as false and politically motivated.

Neither the University nor the centre have reacted to Dr Gubad’s predicament. His family are calling for this silence to be broken.


The centre

According to its website, the Oxford Nizami Ganjavi Centre was established in 2019 to study the “history, languages and cultures of Azerbaijan, the Caucasus and Central Asia”. The centre offers visiting fellowships and funding for graduate students, and supports Azerbaijani language instruction at Oxford. It is funded by an anonymous £10 million endowment “given in recognition of the British Foundation for the Study of Azerbaijan and the Caucasus [BFSAC] in 2018”.

On the centre’s board sits Nargiz Pashayeva, the sister-in-law of President Ilham Aliyev, the autocratic ruler of Azerbaijan. Her sister, Mehriban Aliyeva, is Azerbaijan’s First Lady and first ever ‘Vice President’, the second highest constitutional office in the country to which her husband appointed her immediately after creating it in 2017.

Freedom House characterises Azerbaijan as an authoritarian regime, with power “heavily concentrated in the hands of Ilham Aliyev … and his extended family. Corruption is rampant, and the formal political opposition has been weakened by years of persecution.”

Dr Tena Prelec, Assistant Professor at the University of Rijeka and a former Research Fellow at Oxford’s Department of Politics and International Relations, told Cherwell: “[Pashayeva’s] connections with the Azerbaijani ruling elite could not be stronger. It has been proven that hundreds of millions of pounds linked to the Azerbaijani elite have been laundered through UK real estate (the Azerbaijani Laundromat); while attempts by Azerbaijan to influence political decisions through bribery have also been established beyond doubt (the so-called ‘caviar diplomacy’ scandal at the Council of Europe). For those reasons alone, Pashayeva’s involvement in an Oxford research centre warrants particular care and attention.”

In addition to being on the ONGC’s board, Nargiz Pashayeva played a key role in setting up the centre. She is credited with establishing collaboration with the University back in 2014 in the form of the ‘Nizami Ganjavi Programme’, a five-year research programme worth £1 million with similar research aims. She also “facilitated” the creation of the ONGC itself in her role as chair of the British Foundation for the Study of Azerbaijan and the Caucasus (BFSAC). 

Given its focus on cultural studies, the centre appears non-political. However, in a letter to the Foreign Secretary in 2020 urging the UK to take a more pro-Azerbaijan approach regarding conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia, Lord Malcolm Bruce described the ONGC as an “important symbol of inclusiveness promoted by Azerbaijan today”. Lord Bruce is a member of the UK House of Lords and was also the British co-founder of BFSAC, the charity chaired by Pashayeva and recognized by the ONGC’s mystery £10 million donor. BFSAC closed down in October 2022.

Lord Bruce told Cherwell he “supported the establishment of the [ONGC] as a non-political, academic and cultural centre for promoting interest in the Caucasus and central Asian region”, noting that “the donation enabling the foundation of the centre was subject to and approved through Oxford University due diligence”. 

Regarding the contents of his 2020 letter, he pointed to UN criticism of Armenia’s actions at the time and emphasised that his “only interest was and remains in securing a long-term settlement and improvement in Azerbaijan-Armenia relations”, adding that he has “been critical of the regime in Azerbaijan and the lack of free and fair elections”.

Lord Bruce was formerly the Council of Europe’s Rapporteur for Political Prisoners from 2003-2005, and is noted in ESI’s ‘Caviar Diplomacy’ report as having taken a relatively critical stance towards the Azerbaijani regime. 


The funding

When asked about the identity of the anonymous donor, Oxford University told Cherwell: “The University will not disclose the name of the donor; the terms of the gift are such that the donor wanted to be anonymous, and the University is respecting that agreement. 

“All major prospective donors are carefully considered by the University’s Committee to Review Donations and Research Funding under the University’s guidelines for acceptance. The committee, which includes independent, external representatives, has robust and rigorous guidelines regarding the acceptance of donations and research funding.”

A University spokesperson previously told Times Higher Education that the donation “does not come from a government”. 

When Cherwell prompted the University to clarify what scope is given to the term ‘government’ in this statement, the University re-emphasised the expertise of its donations review committee, adding that the committee “was made aware of the donor of this gift, who was considered and approved through our usual due diligence process”.

Dr. Prelec emphasised to Cherwell that “it is not enough for the public to know that the donor was not a governmental entity. In many countries … much of the political economy rests on an exchange of favours between businesspeople and the rulers.

“In order to be able to conduct business and prosper, individuals hoping to do business in or with Azerbaijan often donate hefty sums to philanthropic activities that are used to enhance Azerbaijan’s image in the world. Alex Dukalskis has called this money-fuelled burnishing of a country’s reputation ‘authoritarian image management’.”

In an Azernews article from early 2017, Pashayeva is quoted saying she “would like to thank Mr Iskandar Khalilov for his first financial support of the Oxford Nizami Ganjavi Centre”. 

Iskandar Khalilov (name sometimes spelt as Iskander or Iskender) is an Azerbaijani businessman. He is the founder of ISR Holdings, which describes itself as “one of the largest [structures] in the private sector of Azerbaijan”. He also appears to have been on the board of directors for Russian state oil company Slavneft, and according to Azerbaijani state media has been Vice President for Russian multinational energy corporation LUKOIL Oil Company. In 2016, Khalilov was amongst those awarded by the Azerbaijani President for services to the development of the Azerbaijani diaspora. 

When asked to clarify what financial contribution from Khalilov was being referred to, the University declined to comment further. This reply came in a new email thread with ‘confidential’ added to the subject line in all caps. 

In response to Cherwell’s Freedom of Information request asking for details on any donations received by Khalilov, the University would neither confirm nor deny whether it held this information. The University argued that exemptions protecting personal data and commercial interest applied, and said it “would not be appropriate for the University to provide information which could lead to donors … being identified by a process of elimination”.

Dr John Heathershaw, Professor of International Relations at Exeter University and founding member of the Academic Freedom and Internationalisation Working Group, told Cherwell: “It was a serious error of judgement by Oxford’s gift committee to agree to an anonymous £10 million donation … In the US it would have been illegal to accept such a high donation anonymously and in the UK it is certainly unethical.

“While confidentiality in small donations is reasonable, it is never admissible in large donations, especially with respect to regions and topics where there are credible risks of reputation laundering and authoritarian influencing.” 


The silence

Neither the University nor the ONGC have responded to the arrest and ongoing detention of Dr Gubad Ibadoghlu, a UK-based Azerbaijani academic, democracy advocate and regime critic.

Dr Gubad, a Senior Visiting Fellow at LSE, was arrested in late July while visiting family in Baku. He was charged initially with selling counterfeit money and then with distributing religious extremist materials. Human Rights Watch has dismissed these charges as “false” and “politically motivated”, and demands his immediate release. Dr Gubad is reportedly being denied medical attention in prison and his family have expressed concern about the impact on his health.

Tomila Lankina, LSE Professor of International Relations, has been working closely with the campaign to secure Dr Gubad’s release. Speaking to Cherwell, she questioned the ONGC’s silence on the matter: “The question is, where is their voice? I would have thought a centre at one of the most prestigious institutions would have done something by now, because they have much better connections than everyone else…

“If they have someone close to the regime [Pashayeva], one would think they would use those channels to secure the release of a man who’s health conditions have deteriorated since imprisonment and on whose behalf there has been a huge campaign.”

Lankina said she found the anonymity of the ONGC’s donor combined with the identity of its board members “deeply troubling”.

Zhala Bayramova, Dr Gubad’s daughter, told Cherwell regarding the ONGC’s silence that “at the very least” she would like to see a statement from the centre and the University expressing their concern.

She added, “If they cannot even muster a Twitter statement, which is a minimal gesture of endorsement and support without significant binding power, it raises serious doubts about their commitment, especially when they are meant to be guardians of scholars.”

Regarding the anonymous funding, Zhala emphasised that “it is imperative for universities to prioritise transparency”, as anonymity can “obscure the nature of donations and their impact on university policies and decision-making processes”. 

Similarly, Dr Heathershaw noted that “given Oxford’s secrecy [about the donor], it is not appropriate for the sister-in-law of the President of Azerbaijan to sit on the board of ONGC…. While there is little doubt that any direct attempts to limit academic freedom would be challenged by other members of the [ONGC] board, we know that research activities are influenced in more subtle ways including who is likely to apply to fellowship positions and what they propose if there is a perception of preference to a particular regime.”

The University told Cherwell: “The [ONGC’s] Board comprises seven members, five of whom are Oxford University academics and two of whom were nominated by [BFSAC]. Each member serves a three-year term which is extendable for one further term, and the Board reports to the University’s Faculty of Asian and Middle Eastern Studies….

“All research projects and researchers at Oxford University have absolute freedom of academic enquiry without influence from donors or donations. The [ONGC] follows these principles and academic decisions about their research agenda and outputs are made entirely independently of the Board, donors or any political interests in Azerbaijan.”

Emin Bayramli, one of Dr Gubad’s sons, expressed concern that the ONGC, as a space the Azerbaijani community in Oxford is likely to rely on, is not fit for purpose: “It’s essential for individuals living abroad, many of whom have relocated … to have impartial and secure spaces… As someone living in exile, I would not feel secure seeking support from a centre [whose board] is closely related to a dictator”. 

Adding that “[i]t is crucial for institutions to demonstrate their commitment to academic freedom and the protection of scholars, and issuing a statement is a minimal but necessary step in that direction”, Emin called for the ONGC and the University to do so. 

The ONGC and Nargiz Pashayeva have been approached for comment. Cherwell has also tried to reach Iskandar Khalilov through ISR Holdings.

https://cherwell.org...t-lse-academic/



#80 Yervant1

Yervant1

    The True North!

  • Super Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,672 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 March 2024 - 07:16 AM

German Television Exposes Azerbaijan’s

Massive Bribery of European Officials
 
By Harut Sassounian
TheCaliforniaCourier.com

This is not the first time that autocratic Azerbaijan has come under scrutiny for handing out billions of dollars in bribes to Western officials to ignore its massive violations of the human rights of its own population and Artsakh Armenians.

The term ‘Caviar diplomacy’ was coined to describe specifically the corrupt practices of Azerbaijan in European institutions. Regrettably, some equally corrupt European officials were happy to pocket the millions of dollars offered to them by Azerbaijan.

“Bringing this intricate web of influence and manipulation to light is a groundbreaking film by German broadcaster ARD, ‘Am Abgrund’ (on the precipice). Though the film is fiction, it is based on a series of investigations dubbed ‘Azerbaijani Laundromat,’ exposing how the Azerbaijani government bribed the Council of Europe politicians. The investigations published in 2017 discovered how the government of Azerbaijan was the driving force behind a $2.9 billion secret slush fund that may have helped it pay off European politicians,” Lamiya Adilgizi wrote on the globalvoices.org website.

“Baku has cleverly navigated the corridors of power in Europe, winning over politicians with a mix of luxurious trips and direct cash payments. The aim? To ensure these influential voices speak up for Azerbaijan's interests, particularly within the halls of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) and even Germany's own Bundestag,” wrote Adilgizi.

The film, directed by investigative reporter Daniel Harrich, premiered at an event organized by the German Parliament on February 20. A follow-up documentary is planned to further reveal Azerbaijan’s corrupt lobbying efforts in Europe.

The film exposes both the bribe-giving Azeris and bribe-taking European officials. “At the heart of this tale is both Azerbaijan, a country rich in energy resources and scrutinized over its ruling government’s authoritarian practices, but also European countries, known as champions of democracy, rule of law, and human rights, who have long been mentors to the emerging nations from the Soviet era. But here's the twist -- instead of spreading these cherished values, it seems they, too, are vulnerable to corruption….”

The movie starts with Azerbaijan’s efforts to silence its domestic opponents who are thrown in jail for bravely exposing the regime’s human rights violations. It features “dramatic scenes that replicate footage from hidden cameras planted in the bedroom of renowned journalist Khadija Ismayilova in 2012, exposing her private life. Ismayilova penned a series of investigations into government corruption linked to the ruling family of Aliyevs. The leaked footage aimed to tarnish the journalist’s reputation. Ismayilova was later jailed on bogus charges and spent two years behind bars as a result.”

The film follows “Gerd Meineke, a fictional member of the German Bundestag who also serves in the Council of Europe. Meineke discovers that the latter institution created back in 1949 to foster democracy and the rule of law has been compromised and that German Members of Parliament have been swayed by Azerbaijan's regime, trading their votes in the Council of Europe for money, gold, prostitutes, and other bribes, betraying the principles of democracy and human rights.”

Meineke’s attempt to pass a resolution condemning Azerbaijan for its numerous political prisoners is defeated by other members after receiving bribes from Azerbaijan.

During the discussion following the screening of the film, director Harrich said: “The issue extended beyond the government of Azerbaijan and implicated Western politicians and societies in the corrupt practices fueled by Azerbaijan's natural resources. Among the guests to the screening was the German Member of Parliament Frank Schwabe who has recently become known for his loud criticism of the Azerbaijani government. It was Schwabe who challenged the credentials of the Azerbaijani delegation at the PACE during the Assembly’s opening winter session in January 2024.”

Schwab told Global Voices that his attempt to tell the truth about Azerbaijan “aligns with the mission of the Council of Europe. If a member of this organization doesn't respect its principles, then action is necessary.” After boycotting Russian gas due to the war in Ukraine, Europe started buying gas from Azerbaijan which is partly imported from Russia. However, “it's crucial that we don't overlook human rights violations for the sake of trade relationships,” Schwab said.

After PACE’s refusal to ratify the credentials of Azerbaijan’s delegation in January 2024, “‘the timing [for the film’s launch] couldn't be better,’ said Gerald Knaus, the chairman of the European Stability Initiative, a think tank, and a vocal critic of the Azerbaijani government, in an interview with Global Voices. His think tank coined the term ‘caviar diplomacy’ in 2012 and was the first to document Azerbaijan’s influence at the Council of Europe.”

Knaus warned of the possible expulsion of Azerbaijan from the Council of Europe if it does not release its political prisoners by April 2024, the 75th anniversary of the Council of Europe.

There are over 200 political prisoners in Azerbaijan.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users