As per usual, Arman has started this thread with gender in the back of his mind, rather than compromise. If it was a discussion on compromise that he truly cared about, he would not have attacked women in his first post. Instead of saying: "all women want to compromise, and I hate that," he could have just as easily said: "Let's talk about compromise. What do you think?" without bringing gender as a divisive tool. He does the same with race, sexuality, and anything else that potentially forms groups and divides them, thinking he is being intelligent and different, instead of silly and shallow.
And this is where nairi replies to me without replying to me directly. It's that stage of the thread where she is already fed up after buttons being pushed. Thinking she is psychic and knows my motivations, she will spill her opinion because it's better to ignore everything else. She would much rather make assumptions and generalizations, all the while claiming she hates generalizations and mice who make them. When I stated that I talk about women, because as a man, this thread is written from the perspective of me as a man, she wouldn't believe that and why should she, right? She won't have that! How dare anyone introduce anything related to subjective perceptions, and the ability to differentiate between things! That is how racists are born! After pointing out nairi's hypocrisy, she became even more inflamed and irate. That is the way she is. She cannot possibly stand dissent, disagreement or anything or anyone that has views that fall way beyond her ideological prism of no stereotypes, men are evil, women can do no wrong, and "I am always right because I can't stand criticism."
Edited by Anonymouse, 16 August 2007 - 08:21 AM.